Live Search is researching a ranking feature similar to Google’s Page Rank called Browse Rank.
Friday, 3 October 2008
After being jilted by a lover
, is it natural to seek solace in the arms of another?
Please allow us this brief moment to be dramatic since we are going to press on to a little-known document, to Google fans anyway, that was a tedious read.
It’s no secret that Microsoft is itching to take over Google’s place with Live Search. A gargantuan ambition worthy of the software giant considering that it places a distant third in the U.S. search market behind Yahoo and Google. Data from ComScore shows that 8.3% of searchers use Microsoft’s search engine while 63% uses Google.
Looks like Microsoft has another trick up it sleeves apart from that Yahoo take-over bid. Researchers were busy drawing up a ranking scheme that will rival that of Google’s Page Rank. However, instead of an easily gamed system relying on incoming links, Microsoft mainly uses visitors’ browsing behavior gathered from browsers and servers. It is not yet clear though how they will implement the infamous little green pixels.
Microsoft’s method is interesting, especially the way they disclosed their algorithm. Google’s search and ranking algorithm is a secret and it has spawned a whole web industry of guesswork and gaming.
We are quoting the abstract with words in bold characters for emphasis by us below.
This paper proposes a new method for computing page importance referred to as BrowseRank. The conventional approach to compute page importance is to exploit the link graph of the web and to build a model based on that graph. For instance, PageRank is such an algorithm, which employs a discrete-time Markov process as the model. Unfortunately, the link graph might be incomplete and inaccurate with respect to data for determining page importance, because links can be easily added and deleted by web content creators.
In this paper, we propose computing page importance by using a ’user browsing graph’ created from user behavior data. In this graph, vertices represent pages and directed edges represent transitions between pages in the users’ web browsing history. Furthermore, the lengths of staying time spent on the pages by users are also included. The user browsing graph is more reliable than the link graph for inferring page importance.
This paper further proposes using the continuous-time Markov process on the user browsing graph as a model and computing the stationary probability distribution of the process as page importance. An efficient algorithm for this computation has also been devised. In this way, we can leverage hundreds of millions of users’ implicit voting on page importance. Experimental results show that BrowseRank indeed outperforms the baseline methods such as PageRank and TrustRank in several tasks.
The entire document can be downloaded here. It was released midyear of 2008.

No. 1 — October 3rd, 2008 at 8:51 pm
I hope this works! If it does, then it means ranking better in Google will increase your BrowseRank, which will increase the number of people finding you and linking to you, which will increase your Google rankings and traffic from Google, which will increase your BrowseRank, which will increase the number of people finding you and linking to you…
It’s a nice little self-reinforcing combination.
Shanes last blog post..10 Questions for Affiliate Confession’s Alan LeStourgeon
No. 2 — October 5th, 2008 at 10:43 pm
I am not a fan of Microsoft at all, but I really hope this works just so maybe it will push google to make their PageRank harder to manipulate. Right now there are so many people that waste so much energy trying to increase their PageRank when they could be spending that time actually trying to drive in quality traffic. Best of luck to Microsoft.
Jareds last blog post..PageRank – It’s Not That Important
No. 3 — October 9th, 2008 at 9:08 am
@ Shane
We never thougth about that. You’re right, it can be a win-win situation.
@ Jared
Ha ha… we’re among those fixated with Google’s PR.
But we’ve dropped the whole thing now since we have a lot to do researching niches, developing other sites, and creating content.
We’re not a big fan of Microsoft either. They’ve got the resources to make their browser and search engine better yet they’re simply surviving. But if they can improve live search and make this browser rank work, we’re all for it t0o.
No. 4 — December 11th, 2008 at 11:48 am
Google is not less than a magic which we can find everywhere. Anyhow I am not ignoring other search engines and Live search is on my 2nd. I always try my best to take Live with me for my SEO campaigns and it never disappoint me.
Leonardo Medinas last blog post..Pousada Natalli – Cabo Frio / RJ – Brasil
No. 5 — March 7th, 2009 at 11:54 pm
To be very true, I am not going to rely on rank things. Perhaps Live’s browser rank might be good because it’s algorithm looks like more smart and sophisticated.
No. 6 — March 26th, 2009 at 7:11 pm
No wonders, Google’s PR has some craze over past few years and it is over. I don’t care about ranks any more but my ranking in search engines. Some people thought that they are co-related but I think rankings have nothing to do with PR or Alexa or any other linkbuilding scale.